Editorial: DTSD Should Not Return To In-Person Classes
March 3, 2021
There are 834,048 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Pennsylvania as of Friday, January 29. There is currently an active outbreak of COVID-19 in Dauphin County. Cases are on the rise. DTSD decided to reopen schools for students to return to their hybrid learning schedule on Tuesday, January 19. Some are even discussing a return by all students to the classroom. This is a huge mistake that puts the student body, the staff, and their families at risk.
A new strain of COVID-19 was found in Dauphin County last week, according to ABC27 news. This new strain, which was discovered in England in December, is even more contagious than what we’ve experienced to this point. Researchers are estimating, according to NPR, that this new strain could be 50% more transmissible than the original wave of COVID.
With the current outbreak that Pennsylvania is experiencing, sending kids back to the school buildings is dangerous. While wearing masks and keeping distance definitely helps, there are still no guarantees when it comes to the virus, and it would be reckless to possibly expose the staff and students.
Reopening the school buildings for in-person classes not only puts the students and teachers at risk, but also their families. A student could catch the virus at school and bring it home. Many students and staff members live with older relatives or family members who have preexisting conditions. These conditions leave them more susceptible to more severe illness if they contract the virus.
The best way to prevent this risk is to minimize the amount of contact that students and staff have, which is the direct opposite of what reopening the schools would do. By flooding the halls with people, the District is showing no concern for their employees, students, or their families.
The bottom line is that DTSD should remain closed until COVID-19 has been reduced in numbers. The vaccine is on its way. Phase Two, which included K-12 teachers, is set to start in February, while the general public is scheduled to start receiving it during Phase Three that starts in April.
The return to the classrooms is rushed and will only result in another quick shutdown. Contact the superintendent, Joe McFarland, and voice your concerns about an overly hasty reopening.
Chuck • Mar 20, 2021 at 3:00 pm
Students should be in class. Imagine how this is effecting them socially and intellectually. My neighbors choose to stay have their children home for over a year and they are bored out of their mind. Some friends who go to a close by district have been in person since the beginning of this Scholl year and everything has been going great the whole time. Overall, the benefits of having students in person outweigh the potential risks. If someone is going to get sick, they could get it from being at the grocery store. It could come from anywhere. Why set students back and hinder their education when there is the opportunity to let them have the challenge of overcoming obstacles at an early age before they get to college. Many colleges are also already back in person. Many more are planning to be back in person soon. Again, disagree with this article. Well written, but students should be in person
Robert Sterner • May 7, 2021 at 7:43 am
Chuck, thank you for your reply. That’s the great thing about editorials and our comments section: they foster a lively debate!
Robert Sterner, advisor